Tuesday, August 27, 2013

In Celebration of MLK's "I Have a Dream" Speech - repost from Mesquite Citizen Journal


Breaking Unjust Laws–A 50 Year Celebration

By: Terry Donnelly

One would have had to be in a cave recently not to realize that today, August 28, marks the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech. But, I am compelled to add my two-cents worth.

In 1963 King stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial at the end of the Federal Mall and delivered the speech that became his opus.

From 1955 until his 1968 assassination, King and his civil rights devotees had many moments in the media spotlight as news spread far and wide informing a mostly unfamiliar population of Americans about the plight of black Americans in the former confederate states. The thunder roll started slowly. Minstrel-like volunteers furtively traveled to black churches and secret meetings spreading news about the movement. Then, during the summer of 1955, in rural Mississippi, two brothers who were Ku Klux Klan members killed Emmitt Till, a Chicago teenager visiting family. Till’s death sentence crime was talking to a white woman. His mother put her son’s horrifically beaten body on display and media covered the story. The gruesome photos gave northern readers a first glimpse of Southern hate crimes.

Within three months of Till’s murder, Rosa Parks turned thumbs down to a then legal request that she relinquish her bus seat to a white man. Her arrest and subsequent jailing caused another media stir and launched the yearlong Montgomery Bus Boycott.

The significance of the boycott was twofold. One, it resulted in the first chink in the armor of Jim Crow laws when a year later a federal court ruled that there could be no more discrimination on public transportation. The second was the first broad public glimpse of the young pastor of the Dexter Street Baptist Church. The thus far unheralded 26 year old had been elected by his flock to lead the boycott under the umbrella of the Montgomery Improvement Association. Guess who.

Between 1956 and 1963, event after event continued framing the Civil Rights Movement. There were more court decisions–many brought about by actions of civil disobedience perpetrated under the leadership and watchful eye of Dr. King. His name was becoming a household word by April of 1963 when he and Dr. Ralph Abernathy were arrested in Birmingham, Alabama after a peaceful protest sponsored by another King led organization, The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).

Many blacks were not convinced that breaking laws, even unjust laws, was the way to effect change. It did not matter that all protests were completely nonviolent, strictly following the teachings of Gandhi as taught to King by Jawaharlal Nehru. While in his cell, King wrote a letter to those who thought breaking laws, even with peaceful protest, was wrong. The “Letter from Birmingham Jail” addressed the naysayers with steely determination to keep the movement going. A serendipitous side effect of King’s letter of reprimand to elders was that it struck a massive chord in the spirits of young blacks who were getting fed up with the unconscionable rule of Jim Crow that had been in place since 1876.

King wrote and the youth heard loudly and clearly: “Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself, and that is what has happened to the American Negro. Something within has reminded him of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained.”

If the “I Have a Dream” speech is King’s opus, then the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is Opus #2.

Two weeks after King and Abernathy were freed, the “Children’s Crusade” was staged to protest the arrest. Birmingham’s school children went out in waves marching through the streets. Notorious bad guy Bull Connor had his officers arrest the marchers. As soon as one group was arrested and hauled off to jail, another group left the park. Thousands of kids were handcuffed and spent the night in jail. They sang songs and had fun as if the incarceration were a friend’s slumber party. The next day, after their release, they did it all again. Connor got so frustrated that he turned fire hoses and dogs on the children. The ensuing mass media coverage made nightly news and front pages across the country. The Civil Rights Movement was for real.

Next, to keep the heat on and set the tone for the continued fight for equality, SCLC organized The August March on Washington. The group was learning the power of the relatively new medium of television. They made sure the cameras were rolling and microphones live when Dr. King stood on the steps at the feet of Abraham Lincoln and started delivering his remarks. An hour before he spoke he looked out on the mall at over a quarter million people. The masses, the moment, the media, and the aura of the man sitting in the huge, stone chair inspired Dr. King to deviate from his prepared text and deliver from his heart the words with which we all are so familiar: “I have a dream today…”

The movement went on for two more years, finally coming to a jubilant conclusion with the 1964 Civil Rights Act and cemented into history with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

On August 16 when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law, it melded with the 15th Amendment, all the federal court decisions, and new laws that chipped away at discrimination. Finally banished were any legal restrictions against anyone’s wish to exercise his or her constitutionally given right to equality.                           

Legal unblocking does not end the discussion. Equality will not be achieved until all people are judged by the “content of their character.” Because bigotries still exist we continue to recognize August 28, 1963. We celebrate not just one man, but also all people who fought and are still fighting for unbiased equality.

We shall overcome–someday!

Much of the data for this column were retrieved from First You Hear Thunder, Terry’s historical fiction account of the Civil Rights Movement.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Letter to the Editor–Las Vegas Review Journal -- Give Obamacare a Chance


Letter to the R-J Editor
Aug. 7, 2013

The Wednesday, August 7 Las Vegas Review Journal editorial “Waivers, favors” shows so much eagerness to trash Obamacare that the R-J editors are chomping at the bit and can’t wait until after selected aspects are put in place to see if they work or not. The column admits to not having information (“details haven’t been released”), and suggests the president has “again broken the law” when that part of the program hasn’t been implemented. It continues by citing the Wall Street Journal as if it were a court of law having authority to rule on the legality of President Obama’s anticipated actions–actions discovered through unidentified “leaks”. The editorial uses “perhaps” to try to convince readers of Obama’s intentions, and cites higher premium payments with “could be” when dollar amounts are not yet available–shame on you R-J.

The main problem discussed is really quite simple. Senator Chuck Grassley (Iowa) introduced, and got accepted an amendment to include Congress and its employees in the original Affordable Care Act passed in 2009. Grassley didn’t provide, until 2017 when the ACA takes care of it, a method for the government benefits program to pay the portion of healthcare congressional members have already been receiving. Being a government entity, moving money around is tricky. There needs to be an exact system in place for the government to continue to pay the long-standing employee benefit. This shortcoming was noticed long before the change was to take place, and it seems like officials have worked out a system to pay while moving the insurance policies from the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan to the exchanges. It looks like they did their jobs and should be applauded.

Senator Dean Heller (R–Nev.) tried to muddy these same waters in a press release on Friday, April 26. He too suggested that Congress was secretly discussing a road out of Obamacare. That was not the gist of the discussions at that time either. They were simply looking for a way to protect the employee benefit they have enjoyed all along. That is what this current flap is also about–not a move away from Obamacare, rather putting a system in place where they can retain their working benefit while getting insurance from the exchanges.

There are tons of other fear-invoking warnings in the editorial that seem to have come straight out of Tarot cards. The warning of taxpayers having to pay higher premiums is not supported with reported facts. Many states are looking at lower premiums when the exchanges kick in. The idea that taxpayers will have to start subsidizing others is false on its face because we are already subsidizing the uninsured going to emergency rooms for general health care. This practice will soon stop resulting in savings.

We should also understand that “unilaterally delaying the employer mandate for a year for large businesses” is not illegal, just being responsible in making sure the system in place works well and does not interrupt anyone’s coverage when implemented.

I’ll listen to trash talk only if Obamacare actually fails. I think I’ll be waiting eons.