Part 1: What Tiger Woods has meant to golfers
By: Terry Donnelly
Eldrick “Tiger” Woods.
Seeing that name in print or hearing it over the airwaves
brings on an intense reaction from nearly every person who has been conscious
the last 20 years. There are a handful of celebrities who are recognizable by
one name and who rest upon the absolute pinnacle of society. Woods is more than
a sportsman; he is a transformational modern culture icon.
Okay, that said, those intense reactions run the gambit from
loving to loathing, from superstar to subhuman. Tiger Woods made himself into a
massive brand that transcends any one individual. However, when the individual
showed himself as a mere mortal, he has both failed, bringing upon himself
immense scorn; and reached great heights with his foundation for kids and
humanitarian acts. When working within his field, the 18 holes of a golf
course, he has few, if any, peers.
It is because of this celebrity that those involved in news
and discussion outlets (including myself) choose to focus time and words on
this charisma laden media magnet.
Love him or hate him there are a few facts that cannot be
denied. If you hate him for his apparent misogynistic leanings, or are tired of
seeing only his shots on Sunday afternoon television while the rest of the
field plays behind the scenes, or you want him to succeed because he represents
a level of expertise possibly never before achieved, or you want the field to
rise to the challenge; all of those opinions must stem from a series of facts.
The overriding fact here is that Tiger Woods changed the
game of golf for golfers. There are basically two men who can claim that mantle
since Mary Queen of Scots got hooked on the game in the 1500s. Woods is, of
course one, and the other is Arnold Palmer.
Palmer came along in the early 1950s. At that time
professional golfers were second-class citizens who changed their shoes in the
parking lot and were considered entertainment for the golfing gentry. Sam Snead,
one of those always mentioned when the word “greatest” is uttered within a golf
conversation, played for over 40 years and won a record 82 professional
tournaments from 1931 to 1973. During that time he won exactly $712,972–second
place in last year’s Masters Tournament won more than that.
Then along came Arnold and his army of fans in 1952. Actually
Arnie’s Army came later as fans flocked to watch him play whether it was in
person or on the new outlet for golf–television. An equal measure of Arnie and
TV moved the needle on how professional golfers were treated and the kind of
living they could make at the game. The winner of the 1952 Masters Tournament
won $4,000. When Arnie won his first in 1958, he won $11,250. By 1980, 22 years
later when Arnie was all but done with competitive golf and had worked his
magic, the winner took home almost five times that amount–$55,000.
The mix of television and Arnold Palmer brought about a new
era for professional golf. The television contracts and the throngs of people
who flocked to tournaments around the country put money in the coffers and the
share for each participant began to rise. Golfers quickly went from traveling
by carpool from tournament to tournament and having to live by their wits as
well as their clubs, to being household names who flew on chartered (or in
Arnie’s case his own) jets. The pros knew it too. To a man they realized that
Arnold Palmer had singlehandedly gotten them all a raise in pay and a boost in
status. To this day they all call him “The King” behind his back and “Mister
Palmer” to his face.
Fast forward to 1996. The game had grown even more thanks to
the continued efforts of Palmer and others like Jack Nicklaus and Deane Beman who
were smart and handled the affairs of golf’s celebrity well. When a young man
named Tiger Woods won his first Masters Tournament in 1997 his first place
prize was $450,000, about eight and a half times what Seve Ballesteros won in
1980.
What happened next is almost unexplainable. When Tiger won
again in 2001, his paycheck for the weekend at Augusta was $1.1 million. After
only four years of Tiger being in the field, the purse had more than doubled
and last year’s 2014 winner, Bubba Watson, pocketed $1,440,000. The purse of
the Masters has tripled since 1996 when Tiger Woods burst onto the golf scene.
Television was already a big part of golf, so Woods didn’t
have the novelty factor of the tube to help him change the face of golf once
again.
In 20 years, the last three of which Woods had hardly played
at all due to injuries and other self inflicted personal woes, he redefined
what it meant to be a top golfer. In those years he has amassed 79 victories (three
short of Snead who took over 40 years to win his 82), 14 major tournaments with
18 being the standard set by Nicklaus, and an eye popping $110 million in prize
money. That laps the field in any comparison. Phil Mickelson is second on the
all time money list at $75 million–$35 mil short. Fifth place is $48 million
and 10th is $37 million–pocket change to Woods. Arnold Palmer is 388th
on this list with a miniscule $1.8 million. Any modern player who is around for
even a couple of years has won much more than Palmer did in a star-studded
career.
I’m done writing about the super stars. What about the
average Joe on the pro tour these days–the guy that goes to work on the links
every weekend and shoots a round of par each time. If there were such a golfer
he would have earned $2,111,425 last year. That number is a bit skewed because
of the US Open, which is made rigorous to the point of ridiculous every year
and a score of par, can win. Take away that one million dollar paycheck and our
par shooting pro pockets over one million dollars and never shot a score in the
60s all year.
Suffice it to say that all pro golfers’ boats have risen
with the flood of interest that Tiger Woods brought to the game. He is a
transformational super star of the highest magnitude whether you like the way
he runs his personal life or his approach to the game.
Will he best Snead’s 82 career victories? Likely. Will he
surpass Nicklaus’ 18 majors? Doubtful. Will he retire from the game after his
recent crash-and-burn disaster of a comeback? Not going to happen. Will he ever
regain the respect he held after the year 2000 when he produced maybe the best
golfing year ever? No.
So, Woods’ golfing future seems to be a mixed bag. But, like
Palmer, the other pros know Woods has vastly improved their bank accounts, and
set a higher bar for their golf skills as well.
Golfers and the game of golf are better for having Tiger
prowl among us.
No comments:
Post a Comment